Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Garmon

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 1990No. G007144PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SONENSHINE, J.—

Carolyne and Anabel Jackson appeal a judgment of dismissal of their complaint for damages against Glenda Aron Garmon. They contend their request to arbitrate the action, filed within six months of the expiration of the five-year statute of limitations, tolled the limitations period.

I

On June 4, 1982, Carolyne and Anabel Jackson were injured in an accident. On May 31, 1983, they filed their complaint for personal injuries against Glenda Garmon; Garmon answered and cross-complained. Some modicum of discovery occurred over the next few months, and the Jacksons answered the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Moran v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Porreco v. Red Top RV CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Davenport v. Vido Artukovich & Son, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Lazelle v. LoveladyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Robinson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nanfito v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Greene v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API