Legal Opinion
Davenport v. Vido Artukovich & Son, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 18, 1983No. Civ. 65547PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHAUER, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment (order) of dismissal entered pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 583, subdivision (b).
The case being submitted under California Rules of Court, rule 17(b), we accept as true the appellant’s statement of facts labeled “Chronology.” The complaint in this personal injury action was filed on April 16, 1976, naming several defendants. Although plaintiff filed an at-issue memorandum on January 20, 1978, the litigants engaged in subsequent discovery proceedings and motions, and no trial date or trial setting conference was ever obtained…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rivera v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Liptak v. Diane Apartments, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1980
- Brown v. EngstromCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Lockhart-Mummery v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Fluor Drilling Service, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
3Cited by12 opinions
- Moran v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Porreco v. Red Top RV CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Nanfito v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Ward v. LevinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Johnson v. SantosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.