Rudy v. Slotwinsky
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
TYLER, P. J.—This
is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs granting a permanent injunction against defendant from proceeding to enforce a certain judgment and setting aside and canceling the same.
The complaint alleges that defendant herein on April 17, 1920, commenced an action against the above-named plaintiffs R. L. Rudy and E: D. Hopper and one Garbini, as directors and incorporators of Chateau Bellevue Vineyard Company, a defunct corporation, and that on May 21, 1920, Rudy and Hopper demurred to the complaint, which demurrer was sustained. That an amended complaint was filed on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Borland v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Eisenmayer v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Steen v. MarchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kulchar v. KulcharCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Kulchar v. KulcharCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Cadenasso v. Bank of ItalyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- DeMello v. SouzaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.