DeMello v. Souza
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KANE, J.
In this case we are confronted with strongly competing considerations—one springing from basic equitable principles, the other from pragmatic, legal policies which are essential to the efficient procedural administration of justice.
For reasons which follow, we are persuaded that the latter must prevail, necessitating a reversal of the judgment correcting and confirming an arbitration award.
Appellant Dorothy DeMello is the administratrix of, and a claimant under, the will of William McMillan, deceased, who as a member of the Alameda County Electrical Workers’ Pension Trust, was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hammell v. BrittonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Morris v. ZuckermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Coordinated Construction, Inc. v. Canoga Big" A," Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Goossen v. AdairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Durand v. Wilshire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. Makahuena Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1983
- Severtson v. Williams Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Paul v. PaulWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- Oaktree Capital Management, L.P. v. BernardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Knass v. Blue Cross of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.