Steen v. March
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County. Lucas F. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES,C.
—Action to set aside a judgment and to restrain its enforcement. Defendants’ demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and plaintiff having failed to amend, judgment was entered against him, and he appeals.
Pending the action, William F. March, the principal defendant, died, and the administratrix of his estate was substituted.
The complaint is very long, but a statement of the facts, so far as requisite to a decision of the material questions involved, is as follows: —
In December, 1888, William F. March, and George Olive, and John Ross were mutually interested in the construction of a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- In re Estate of GriffithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Thomas v. Gabrielle Brockenbrough, John Harvie, Edwin Harvie, Jacqueline Harvie, Julia Ann Harvie, Heirs at Law, and Devisees of John HarvieSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- Whitney v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Evans v. BaconMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Electric Plaster Co. v. Blue Rapids City TownshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- Fresno Estate Co. v. FiskeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Robertson v. FreeburyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Rudy v. SlotwinskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Wilmer v. PlacideCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.