Legal Opinion
Wyszomierski v. Siracusa
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 27, 2009No. SC 18154PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROGERS, C. J.
In this medical malpractice dispute, the plaintiff, Mary Wyszomierski, 1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the defendants, Francis Siracusa and Surgical Associates of Windham, P.C. 2 The primary issue in this appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in admitting certain of Siracusa’s testimony regarding his treatment of the decedent, Henry Wyszomierski. The plaintiff also challenges the trial court’s factual findings in its memorandum of decision. We conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the challenged…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Millbrook Owners Ass'n v. Hamilton StandardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Viera v. CohenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Builders Service Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Hammer v. Mount Sinai HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Narumanchi v. DeStefanoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Town of New Hartford v. Connecticut Resources Recovery AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Saunders v. FirtelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- LeBlanc v. New England Raceway, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- State v. WeathersConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.