Legal Opinion

Frye v. Angst

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1965PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The sole issue before the court is whether on these pleadings the insurance companies, or either of them, may be named as parties to the action and be sued by the plaintiff before liability under the policies is established. The questions of direct liability of the insurers to the plaintiff and coverage under the policies are not before this court.

The two pertinent statutes are:

“204.30 (4) Any bond or policy of insurance covering liability to others by reason of the operation of a motor vehicle shall be deemed and construed to contain the following conditions : That the insurer shall be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smedley v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Morgan v. HuntWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Ermis v. Federal Windows Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Bergstein v. PopkinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Snorek v. BoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Saphir v. NeustadtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  2. Marchlik v. Coronet InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Gonzalez Ex Rel. Bichler v. City of FranklinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Lukaszewicz v. Concrete Research, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Davis v. FurlongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API