Legal Opinion

Davis v. Furlong

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 7, 1983No. 81-916PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PETERSON, Justice.

This appeal presents a choice-of-law issue concerning the applicability of Wisconsin’s direct action statute or Minnesota’s common law prohibition of direct actions against an insured’s liability carrier. The district court summarily granted plaintiffs’ motion to join insurer as a defendant. We reverse.

Plaintiff, Melanie Davis, was severely injured on January 19, 1979, in a collision between the car in which she was riding, driven by defendant Russell J. Knudsen, and a car driven by defendant Robert F. Furlong. The accident happened near Hag-er City, Wisconsin, but plaintiff…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Milkovich v. SaariSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  2. Herrick v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  3. Myers v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  4. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HerrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Weston v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State Trading Corporation of India, Ltd. v. Assuranceforeningen SkuldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  2. Schwan's Sales Enterprises, Inc. v. Sig Pack, Inc., Doboy DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  3. Parkhill v. Minnesota Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
  4. Danielson v. National Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  5. Davis v. RobertsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API