Gardner v. Gardner
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Chief Judge.
Defendant presents numerous arguments in support of his assignments of error directed primarily to findings of fact and conclusions of law by the trial court. Findings of fact by a trial court, being similar to the verdict of a jury, are conclusive on appeal if supported by competent evidence. The weight of such evidence is solely for the trier of facts. Rauchfuss v. Rauchfuss, 33 N.C. App. 108, 234 S.E. 2d 423 (1977). This is especially so in an alimony case. Beall v. Beall, 26 N.C. App. 752, 217 S.E. 2d 98 (1975), aff’d in part and rev’d in part, 290 N.C. 669, 228 S.E.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Eudy v. EudySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Beall v. BeallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Rickert v. RickertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Schloss v. SchlossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Little v. LittleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Gardner v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Stickel v. StickelCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Cornelison v. CornelisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Long v. LongCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.