Legal Opinion

Little v. Little

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 16, 1970No. 7022SC560PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallard, C.J.

Where the trial court finds the facts, it is the rule in North Carolina that the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to support the findings may he raised on appeal. See G.S. 1A-1, Rule 52 of the Rules of Civil Procedure. It is also a well-established rule in North Carolina that:

“The court’s findings of fact are conclusive if supported by any competent evidence, and judgment supported by such findings will be affirmed, even though there is evidence contra, or even though some incompetent evidence may also have been admitted. * * *” 1 Strong, N.C. Index 2d, Appeal and Error, § 57, pp.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Schloss v. SchlossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Mercer v. MercerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Wall Ex Rel. Wall v. TimberlakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Peoples v. PeoplesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Goodson v. GoodsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Spencer v. SpencerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Hollerbach v. HollerbachCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Carter v. Wilson Const. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API