Legal Opinion

Rickert v. Rickert

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 13, 1972No. 37PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Justice.

The principal question for decision is whether Chief District Judge C. Walter Allen erred by ordering defendant to pay plaintiff’s counsel fees in any amount. G.S. 50-16.1 et seq., particularly G.S. 50-16.3 and G.S. 50-16.4, are pertinent to decision of this appeal. G.S. 50-16.4 provides:

§ 50-16.4. Counsel fees in actions for alimony. — At any time that a dependent spouse would be entitled to alimony pendente lite pursuant to G.S. 50-16.3, the court may, upon application of such spouse, enter an order for reasonable counsel fees for the benefit of such spouse, to be paid and…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Rural Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. H. C. Jones Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Moore v. HumphreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. Farmer Ex Rel. Farmer v. FerrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Pain v. . PainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  5. Underwood v. StaffordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Bryant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  3. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. FowlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API