Legal Opinion

Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 13, 2012No. Nos. 09-844C, 10-741CPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

LETTOW, Judge.

The deliberative process privilege protects “documents reflecting advisory opinions, recommendations and deliberations comprising part of a process by which governmental decisions and policies are formulated.” Department of Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass’n, 532 U.S. 1, 8, 121 S.Ct. 1060, 149 L.Ed.2d 87 (2001) (quoting National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 421 U.S. 132, 150, 95 S.Ct. 1504, 44 L.Ed.2d 29 (1975) (internal quotation marks omitted)). Pending before the court is the United States’ (“the government’s”) assertion of the…

2Cases cited82 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Oasis International Waters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  2. Cameron Lanning Cormack v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  4. Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation v. United States 09-844c &United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  5. Estes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API