Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
The deliberative process privilege protects “documents reflecting advisory opinions, recommendations and deliberations comprising part of a process by which governmental decisions and policies are formulated.” Department of Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass’n, 532 U.S. 1, 8, 121 S.Ct. 1060, 149 L.Ed.2d 87 (2001) (quoting National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 421 U.S. 132, 150, 95 S.Ct. 1504, 44 L.Ed.2d 29 (1975) (internal quotation marks omitted)). Pending before the court is the United States’ (“the government’s”) assertion of the…
2Cases cited82 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Oasis International Waters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Cameron Lanning Cormack v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation v. United States 09-844c &United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Estes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.