Legal Opinion

Estes v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 15, 2016No. 13-1011CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Keywords: Motion to Compel; Attorney-Client Privilege; Work-Product Privilege; Deliberative Process Privilege.

OPINION AND ORDER

KAPLAN, Judge

Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion to compel the government to produce certain documents it asserts are covered by the deliberative process privilege, the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work-product privilege, or a combination of the three. The Court has reviewed the majority of the withheld documents in camera. For the reasons given below, Plaintiffs motion is DENIED.

BACKGROUND

On December 18, 2015, the Court issued an Order permitting “a…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Efw, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API