Legal Opinion
Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation v. United States 09-844c &
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 27, 2013No. 09-844C & 10-741C (consolidated)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Post-trial decision on government’s claim for damages based upon alleged misalloeation of indirect costs to government contracts; statute of limitations; 41 U.S.C. § 7103(a)(4)(A); Cost Accounting Standards; scope and thrust of 48 C.F.R. § 9904.418-50; criteria for proper cost-accounting allocation of indirect costs; significance of costs of management and supervision of activities related to direct labor or materiel costs; applicability of 48 C.F.R. § 9904.418-50(e); proper use of a surrogate to allocate indirect materiel costs
OPINION AND ORDER 1
LETTOW, Judge.
This post-trial decision…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Franconia Associates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- M. Maropakis Carpentry, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Holmes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Morris Kinsey D/B/A Kinsey Farms, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Fallini v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation v. United States 09-844c &United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Combat Support AssociatesArmed Services Board of Contract Appeals · 2014