Legal Opinion
Cameron Lanning Cormack v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 18, 2014No. 1:13-cv-00232PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Patent case; discovery dispute; attorney-client privilege; work-product protection; claw-back request; RCFC 26(b)(5)(B); Fed.R.Evid. 502(b); compelled production of documents from an affiliated nonparty foreign corporate entity that joined with the party in development of the allegedly infringing product; discovery related to nonaeeused products
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
In this patent case, plaintiff, Cameron Lanning Cormack (“Mr. Cormack”), filed a motion to compel discovery responses from defendant-intervenor, Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation (“Northrop Grumman Systems” or…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cameron Lanning Cormack v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- New Orleans Regional Physician Hospital Organization, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Princeton Digital Image Corp. v. Konami Digital Entertainment Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2016
- Cameron Lanning Cormack v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Cameron Lanning Cormack v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.