Legal Opinion

Oak Crest Construction Co. v. Austin Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 8, 1995No. 93C13423; CA A84861PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of defendant in this action for breach of a contract to provide insurance coverage. We affirm.

The facts are undisputed. Plaintiff is a general contractor engaged in the construction of residential homes. Defendant insures plaintiff under a commercial liability policy. Plaintiff was hired to build a custom house, and it retained a subcontractor to paint the cabinets and other woodwork in the home. The subcontractor completed that painting work. Approximately two to three weeks later, the paint failed to cure properly in some…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Hauenstein v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Geddes & Smith, Inc. v. Saint Paul Mercuy Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Artman v. RayOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Ramco, Inc. v. PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Oak Crest Construction Co. v. Austin Mutual InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Simonsen v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. Groshong v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. Brown v. Chas. H. Lilly Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. State v. AmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API