Legal Opinion

Brown v. Chas. H. Lilly Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 7, 1999No. 9503-01381; CA A98898PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Plaintiffs, Robert and Shirley Brown, initiated this action for damages for personal injuries suffered as a result of exposure to defendant’s herbicide fertilizer product, Weed and Feed. The trial court entered summary judgment dismissing the claims on the ground that they are preempted by federal law. Plaintiffs appeal, arguing that the trial court erred in concluding that their claims are preempted. Defendant argues that the trial court was correct. In the alternative, it argues that dismissal was appropriate, because plaintiffs could offer no evidence of causation. We conclude that the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Wisconsin Public Intervenor v. MortierSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kim Netland v. Hess & Clark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  2. Eyl v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Dow Chemical Co. v. EblingIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Etcheverry v. Tri-Ag Serv., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Etcheverry v. Tri-Ag Serv., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API