Legal Opinion

Oak Crest Construction Co. v. Austin Mutual Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 2000No. CC 93C13423; CA A84861; SC S42855PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

This is an action for breach of a standard commercial liability insurance contract. Plaintiff, a general contractor, filed the action when its insurer refused to reimburse it for the cost of removing and replacing a subcontractor’s painting work that had been applied during the construction of a custom home and had failed to cure properly. The trial court granted the insurer’s motion for summary judgment. The Court of Appeals affirmed, holding that plaintiffs claim did not fall within the coverage terms of the policy, because the damage at issue had not been “caused by an occurrence,” as the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Weedo v. Stone-E-Brick, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Artman v. RayOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Knutson Construction Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Finley v. Prudential Life & Casualty InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Kisle v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. United States Fire Insurance v. J.S.U.B., Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2007
  2. Sheehan Construction Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Greystone Construction, Inc. v. National Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  4. Lyerla v. AMCO InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  5. K & L Homes, Inc. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API