Legal Opinion

Artman v. Ray

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1972PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The plaintiff obtained a verdict and judgment against all the defendants for the co aversion of Ms 1949 Ford pickup. The defendants appeal.

The defendant Ray, a deputy sheriff, observed the pickup on the side of the road for several weeks and had it towed by the defendant Davies into Davies’ garage. Several weeks later plaintiff located his truck. Davies told plaintiff that before he could take his pickup he would have to pay a $12 towing charge and a $52 storage charge. Subsequently, plaintiff wrote to defendant Wilburn, the sheriff, demanding that the truck be returned to the place from…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Swick v. MUELLER ET UX.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Simons v. Brashears Transfer and StorageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  3. REID v. ReidOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Minter v. DurhamOregon Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Pearson v. Twohy Bros.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. GreenOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Wiggins v. Barrett & Associates, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Badger v. Paulson Investment Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Bakker v. Baza'r, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. BrungardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API