Legal Opinion
Levine v. Allen
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 18, 1923No. 14377PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
This is an original application for a writ of prohibition. The petitioners were sued in the court of common pleas of Tulsa county, and they allege that chapter 51, Sess. Laws 1923, creating the court of common pleas in all counties having a city therein of over 72,000 and not more than 90,000 population, according to the last preceding regular decennial federal census, is unconstitutional and void for the following reasons, to wit: First, as to its provisions affecting courts of justices of the peace of Tulsa county; second, as to the transfer of causes from the district court of Tulsa county…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Burks v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Lamb & TynerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- State ex rel. Harris v. HerrmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
- Leatherock v. LawterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Hatfield v. GarnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sheldon v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Herndon v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- School Dist. No. 85 v. School Dist. No. 71Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Phelps v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Sanchez v. MelvinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.