Legal Opinion
School Dist. No. 85 v. School Dist. No. 71
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 27, 1928No. 17734PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
A question here presented is whether recovery by a school district of “transfer fe'es” for instruction given is dependent upon the existence of an item being in the estimate made and approved of th'e school district sought to be charged. Involved also is whether an excise board may arbitrarily make an appropriation for transfer fe'es for a school district.
Presented here are two causes of action. As applied to the first, there was at no time an item, 'estimate, appropriation, or provision for paying the transfer charge; as applied to the second, the excise board of Kay county of its own…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Daily Leader v. Cameron, AuditorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
- Smart v. Board of County Com'rs of Craig CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Burks v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Richman v. Supervisors Muscatine CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
- Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Lamb & TynerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Sheldon v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Barrett v. Board of Com'rs of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Jack v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Arps v. State Highway CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- City of Ardmore v. Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.