Legal Opinion

Hatfield v. Garnett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 26, 1915No. 7065PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Original proceeding for a writ of prohibition by Ina B. Hatfield against Charles F. Garnett.

1Opinion of the CourtHardy, J.

This is an original proceeding brought in this court by Ina B. Hatfield, the petitioner, against Charles H. Gar- nett, respondent, in which she seeks a writ of prohibition restraining the respondent, as judge of the superior court of Oklahoma county, from further exercising jurisdiction in the trial of a certain case pending in said court, in which the petitioner is plaintiff and J. E. Thompson is defendant. The right of respondent to exercise jurisdiction in said case is challenged because it is contended that the superior court was abolished by act of the Legislature of March 22, 1913,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Grinnell v. HoffmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Nichols v. WalterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  3. Burks v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. State ex rel. West v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  5. Ladd v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1901

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Leatherock v. LawterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. State Ex Rel. Rucker v. TappSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  3. Roberts v. LedgerwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. AustinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. City of Enid v. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API