Legal Opinion
Morris G. Kaplan v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 13, 1964No. 18741_1PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Circuit Judge.
Appellant’s sole contention is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain his conviction of violating 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (mail fraud). It is unnecessary to recite all testimony before the court, appearing in some 950 pages of testimony. In view of appellant’s claim, it should be noted that on this appeal, the evidence does not alone consist of that to which appellant testified, but all the evidence at the trial, considered in the light most favorable to the government, together with the reasonable inferences which may be drawn therefrom. Glasser v. United States, 1942,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Remmer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Jerome Byrnes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. Roy Arthur NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Marvin Lustiger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. John Robert Heck, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Randolph K. Hiram v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- George James Barnard and Philip Weinstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.