Legal Opinion

Randolph K. Hiram v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 10, 1965No. 18682PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLIN, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Randolph K. Hiram was indicted on the charge of accessory after the fact to bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3. 1 He entered a plea of not guilty, and after a trial by jury was convicted as charged. Appellant filed a timely appeal correctly invoking this court’s jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. His motion to appeal in forma pauperis was granted.

At appellant’s trial, the government’s evidence established that at 11:00 a. m. on December 6, 1962, the San Francisco Marina Office of the Wells Fargo Bank, a member of the Federal Reserve System, was robbed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Colosacco v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  4. Morris G. Kaplan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  5. United States v. ChapmanDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1931

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. Roy Arthur NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  3. John P. Tillman, Robert Barber Moore, Johnny C. Wilson, Larry Fox, Donald P. Stone and Michael W. Simmons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. United States v. Lawrence T. Day. United States of America v. Eric J. SheffeyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. BoydCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API