Holland v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark
Petitioners, husband and wife, stand convicted under § 145 of the Internal Revenue Code 1 of an attempt to evade and defeat their income taxes for the year 1948. The prosecution was based on the net worth method of proof, also in issue in three companion cases 2 and a number of other decisions here from the Courts of Appeals of nine circuits. During the past two decades this Court has been asked to review an increasing number of criminal cases in which proof of tax evasion rested on this theory. We have denied certiorari because the cases involved only questions of evidence and, in isolation,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Spies v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2,904 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. DorantesTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
2,899 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.