Legal Opinion

United States v. Roy Arthur Nelson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 20, 1969No. 23039_1PublishedCited by 225 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWNING, Circuit Judge:

Roy Arthur Nelson and Frank Brew-ton were indicted for robbery of a federally-insured institution in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) (1964). Brewton was found incompetent to stand trial. Nelson was tried separately and convicted. He has appealed on three grounds, all of which relate to the use of circumstantial evidence to secure his conviction.

The government offered direct evidence of the following facts. Brewton entered a bank and presented a teller with a written demand for money. The teller handed Brewton $627 in currency, including five marked $20 bills.…

2Cases cited75 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by225 opinions

  1. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. State v. DorantesTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
  4. United States v. Nelson BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  5. United States v. NevilsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

220 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API