Legal Opinion

United States v. John Robert Heck, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 5, 1974No. 73-1671 to 73-1675 and 73-1697PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Circuit Judge:

One or more of the eleven defendants who are parties to this appeal were charged in one or more counts of a superseding indictment (No. 13708), with having conspired to violate (Count I), or having substantively violated (Count II), 26 U.S.C. § 7212(b).

All defendants were charged in Count III with having conspired (18 U.S.C. § 371) to forcibly assault, oppose, resist, impede, or interfere with various federal officials, or (Counts IV to X) with substantively violating 18 U.S.C. § 111.

We note the difference in the subject matter in section 7212(b) and section 111; and…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. United States v. Frank Stearns GieseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  3. United States v. Nicodemo Scarfo A/K/A "The Little Guy,"Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  4. State v. O'CONNELLSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  5. United States v. Sandra Hernandez, A/K/A "Cha Cha," Ronnie Lee Tape, Karen McCalvin Rodney Gilmore, Rickey RogersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API