Legal Opinion
George James Barnard and Philip Weinstein v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 20, 1965No. 17746_1PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge':
These five appeals are from judgments of conviction rendered against the appellants after a jury trial upon an indictment for violation of Title 18, U.S.C. § 1341 (mail fraud) and Title 18, U.S.C. § 371 (conspiracy).
The indictment alleged that the defendants had planned and carried out certain automobile collisions, in each of which an automobile, which we may call the weapon car, would be intentionally crashed into the rear end of another automobile which we may call the target car. The weapon car’s driver and owner would be insured by liability insurance against…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Harold L. Peek, Jr., and Susanna E. Peek v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Gordon Arthur Lyda and Albert Francis Perrault v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Jerome Byrnes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. Mayo Perez, DefendantsappellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Roy Arthur NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. David Phillip Munoz Bennie E. McGregor Donald L. ThomsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Erwin Edward Ballard, United States of America v. Richard Henry BryanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Harry P. Hutul, Robert Sacks, Herbert Basan, Nancy Mitchell, and Vito LombardiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.