Legal Opinion

Morson v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 15, 2001No. D037161PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HUFFMAN, J.

This coordinated proceeding involves a number of plaintiffs who have filed similar products liability complaints for damages, claiming a number of defendants 1 manufactured or distributed defective products, i.e., latex gloves that the plaintiffs used in their work, that allegedly contained chemical substances (including latex and/or other substances) that were of a toxic nature, and that were causative factors in the development of the plaintiffs’ latex allergies. 2

This writ proceeding arose in response to a general order made by the trial court restricting Plaintiffs from…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Chavez v. Glock, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. McCabe v. American Honda Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. In Re Coordinated Latex Glove LitigationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Jones v. John Crane, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Trejo v. Johnson, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API