Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Centennial Bowl, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1966No. L. A. 28847PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

Charlotte Lee Taylor brought this action for damages for her injuries sustained as the result of an assault committed upon her by a third person while she was an invitee on defendant’s business premises. She alleged that defendant was negligent in failing to protect her adequately, as a patron, from a known danger. After both parties had submitted their evidence, the court granted a motion for a directed verdict in favor of defendant. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment based on that directed verdict.

On such an appeal the evidence most favorable to the plaintiff must be accepted as true. That…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Loper v. MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Gavin v. Protestant Episcopal BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Blumberg v. M. & T. IncorporatedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Isaacs v. Huntington Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Elmore v. American Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Cornpropst v. SloanTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Peterson v. San Francisco Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API