Legal Opinion

Kirk v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1945No. L. A. 19343PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

Plaintiff was nonsuited in an action for personal injuries claimed to have been received as the result of defendant’s negligence.

Broadway, a north-south street, crosses at right angles Seventh, an east-west street in the city of Los Angeles. Both streets have double streetcar tracks on them. The traffic at the intersection is controlled by a traffic light. At 11 o’clock at night defendant was operating a southbound streetcar on its west track on Broadway. Plaintiff, a pedestrian, was proceeding west across Broadway on the south side of Seventh in the middle of the lane marked for pedestrians.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anthony v. HobbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Mosley v. Arden Farms Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Neel v. Mannings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Union Constr. Co. v. Western Union Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Lowell v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Austin v. Riverside Portland Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Gray v. BrinkerhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Phillips v. G. L. Truman Excavation Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Golceff v. SugarmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. United States v. FotopulosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API