State v. Williams
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MITCHELL, Justice.
The defendant brings forward assignments of error relating to the guilt-innocence determination phase and to the sentencing phase of his trial. Having carefully considered each of these assignments, as well as the entire record before us, we find no prejudicial error in either phase of the defendant’s trial. Therefore, we do not disturb the defendant’s conviction or the sentence of death.
I
The evidence presented by the State during the guilt-innocence determination phase of the trial tended to show that *51Adah Herndon Dawson was approximately one hundred years old in August,…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Jurek v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Proffitt v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Godfrey v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by282 opinions
- State v. BlandTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
- McDougall v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. HennisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. BensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
277 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.