Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 4, 1979No. 63PublishedCited by 177 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Justice.

This appeal presents a number of questions arising under our death penalty statute, G.S. 15A-2000, et seq. Of principal importance is the meaning and application here of the impaired *50capacity mitigating circumstance.1 For error in the trial court’s instructions concerning it, defendant is entitled to a new sentencing hearing. Other questions raised and decided relate to (1) procedural requirements for submitting to the jury mitigating circumstances under G.S. 15A-2000(f); (2) the power of the state and defendant to enter into sentence negotiations in a capital case; (3) adequacy…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by177 opinions

  1. McKoy v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Tichnell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  5. State v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989

172 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API