State v. Johnson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Justice.
This appeal presents a number of questions arising under our death penalty statute, G.S. 15A-2000, et seq. Of principal importance is the meaning and application here of the impaired *50capacity mitigating circumstance.1 For error in the trial court’s instructions concerning it, defendant is entitled to a new sentencing hearing. Other questions raised and decided relate to (1) procedural requirements for submitting to the jury mitigating circumstances under G.S. 15A-2000(f); (2) the power of the state and defendant to enter into sentence negotiations in a capital case; (3) adequacy…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by177 opinions
- McKoy v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Tichnell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- State v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
172 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.