State v. Hill
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Chief Justice.
Defendant first assigns as error the denial of his motions to dismiss the charge of first-degree murder on the ground that there was insufficient evidence of premeditation and deliberation.
In State v. Corn, 303 N.C. 293, 278 S.E. 2d 221 (1981), we stated the familiar standards governing the sufficiency of evidence of premeditation and deliberation:
In order for the trial court to submit a charge of first degree murder to the jury, there must have been substantial evidence presented from which a jury could determine that the defendant intentionally shot and killed the…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. BondurantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by279 opinions
- State v. StokesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- State v. McCollumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. GolphinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
274 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.