Legal Opinion

State v. Hamlet

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 6, 1984No. 228A83PublishedCited by 122 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Justice.

The defendant brings forward assignments of error relating to the guilt-innocence determination phase and to the sentencing phase of his trial. We find no prejudicial error in the guilt-innocence determination phase of the defendant’s trial. After a careful review of the facts and our prior decisions, we hold, however, that the jury should not have been permitted to consider whether the murder was “especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel,” under N.C.G.S. 15A-2000(e)(9). Since this was the only aggravating circumstance found by the jury, we vacate the sentence of death and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Godfrey v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by122 opinions

  1. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  3. State v. GolphinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  4. State v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API