Legal Opinion
Hartney v. Hartney
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 29, 2004No. AC 23717; AC 24206PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
These consolidated appeals arise out of the dissolution of the parties’ forty year marriage. With respect to the judgment of dissolution, AC 23717, the defendant, Robert J. Hartney, claims that the trial court improperly (1) denied his motion for a new trial, (2) awarded alimony on the basis of the gross incomes rather than the net incomes of the parties, (3) ordered that he secure his alimony obligation with a policy of life insurance for the benefit of the plaintiff, (4) found that funds in a certain bank account were not his inheritance, (5) apportioned funds maintained…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Schoonmaker v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Weiman v. WeimanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Gallo v. GalloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Bornemann v. BornemannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Jewett v. JewettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Putman v. KennedySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Wolosoff v. WolosoffConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Zahringer v. ZahringerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Schade v. SchadeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Ertel v. RocqueConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.