Legal Opinion
Ertel v. Rocque
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 27, 2008No. AC 27488PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
The plaintiff, Peter H. Ertel, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his action against the defendants, Arthur J. Rocque, Jr., commissioner of environmental protection; David K. Leff, deputy commissioner of environmental protection; and Rachel R. Towbin, an employee of the department of environmental protection (department), in their official and individual capacities. The plaintiff claims that the court (1) impermissibly relied on agency determinations in rendering its decision and (2) improperly held that he had no property interest in either the permit…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bauer v. Waste Management of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Tamm v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Port Clinton Associates v. Board of SelectmenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Filippi v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Town of Orange v. ResnickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Talenti v. Morgan & Brother Manhattan Storage Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Boulanger v. TOWN OF OLD LYMEConnecticut Superior Court · 2010
- Ertel v. RocqueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008