Legal Opinion
Ginn v. Gemini Inc.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided June 5, 1991No. CV-S-90-928-LDG (LRL)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LAWRENCE R. LEAVITT, United States Magistrate Judge.
The dispute which brings this matter to the Court arises out of the limitation imposed by Local Rule 190, subd. 1(c)1 on the number of interrogatories which one party may propound to another party. Rule 190, subd. 1(c) limits the number to 40, including subparts. The question before the Court centers on the interpretation to be given to the phrase “including subparts.”
Earlier in this litigation, Defendant served its first set of interrogatories on the nine named Plaintiffs. Each set included from 10 to 21 interrogatories. Most of *321these…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Clark v. Burlington Northern RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1986
- Myers v. U.S. Paint Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1987
- Valdez v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1991
3Cited by18 opinions
- Safeco v. RawstronDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1998
- Leaffer v. ZarlengoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Kendall v. Ges Exposition Services, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1997
- Mullins v. Prudential InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2010
- Erfindergemeinschaft UroPep GbR v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2016
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.