Legal Opinion
Leaffer v. Zarlengo
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided April 15, 2002No. 01SA324PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice
The petitioners-plaintiffs in this case, Karen and Steven Leaffer, (Petitioners), initiated this original proceeding pursuant to C.A.R. 21, seeking relief from a trial court order denying their motion to compel the respondent-defendants, Gerald V. Zarlengo, Cristee Locke Offerdahl, and Midtown Obstetrics & Gynecology, P.C., (Respondents), to respond to interrogatories and to produce Dr. Zarlen-go's appointment calendar. In a one sentence order, the trial court summarily denied Petitioners' motion - without explanation. Thus, the trial court appears to have accepted Respondents' position (1)…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Clifford F. MacEvoy Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Calvin Tomkins Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- State v. NietoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Travelers Indemnity Company v. BarnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Martin v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- Scholz v. Metropolitan Pathologists, P.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Warne v. HallSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- People v. ShellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- People v. CasiasColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- People Ex Rel. Salazar v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- Silva v. Basin Western, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2002
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.