Lawrence v. First Kansas Bank & Trust Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RUSHFELT, United States Magistrate Judge.
The Court has before it Plaintiffs Motion for Compel Discovery (doc. 24). Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26, 33, 34 and 37, and D.Kan. Rules 37.1 and 37.2, it seeks an order to compel defendant to produce documents and answer interrogatories. Opposing the motion, defendant contends it has reasonably provided the requested discovery, except for production of documents which are privileged, work product, or otherwise protected against discovery.
Defendant challenges the adequacy of the efforts by plaintiff to confer in good faith, as…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Safeco v. RawstronDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1998
- Hilt v. SFC Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1997
- Reed v. BennettDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Kendall v. Ges Exposition Services, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1997
- Lucero v. ValdezDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.