Legal Opinion
Statewide Grievance Committee v. Botwick
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 6, 1993No. 14507PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether the defendant was denied due process of law by having been suspended from the practice of law for a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that was not specifically alleged in a grievance committee’s presentment. The defendant, Edward J. Botwick, an attorney at law, appeals1 from the judgment of the trial court after presentment by the plaintiff, the Statewide Grievance Committee, wherein the trial court found that the defendant had violated rules 8.4 (c)2 and 1.8 (a)3 *301of the Rules of Professional Conduct.4 The trial court ordered that, as…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Spevack v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re DurantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. RozbickiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Massameno v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Burton v. MottoleseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Briggs v. McWeenySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. ShlugerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Thalheim v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.