Legal Opinion
Town of Griswold v. Camputaro
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 7, 2017No. AC38889PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavine, J.
"The court ... has continuing jurisdiction to determine any claim of a vested right acquired during the pendency of an action and prior to its withdrawal, but ... it must first reinstate it on the docket before granting the relief sought.... There is no reason why the trial court does not have jurisdiction to restore a case that has been voluntarily withdrawn to the active docket, just as it can open a judgment or restore to the docket a case that has been erased." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Diamond 67, LLC v. Planning & Zoning Commission , 117 Conn. App. 72 , 79, 978 A.2d 122 (2009).
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Connecticut Fund for the Environment, Inc. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Millbrook Owners Ass'n v. Hamilton StandardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Wiseman v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Fattibene v. KealeyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brown v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
- Town of Griswold v. CamputaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- Town of Griswold v. CamputaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- State v. Douglas C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2023