Hogan v. Washington Mutual Bank, N.A.
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BERCH, Chief Justice.
¶ 1 We granted review to decide whether a trustee may foreclose on a deed of trust without the beneficiary first having to show ownership of the note that the deed secures. We hold that Arizona’s non-judicial foreclosure statutes do not require the beneficiary to prove its authority or “show the note” before the trustee may commence a nonjudicial foreclosure.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶ 2 These consolidated cases involve two properties in Yavapai County purchased by John F. Hogan in the late 1990s. Each parcel became subject to a deed of trust in 2004 when…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Cullen v. Auto-Owners InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 2008
- I. E. Associates v. Safeco Title InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Mid Kansas Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Wichita v. Dynamic Development Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Patton v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Steinberger v. McVeyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Edward Zadrozny v. Bank of New York MellonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Snyder v. HSBC Bank, USA, N.A.District Court, D. Arizona · 2012
- In re: Marshall L. Rader and Barbara J. RaderUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Nordeen v. Bank of America, N.A. (In Re Nordeen)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.