Legal Opinion

Patton v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Phoenix

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1978No. 13558PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Justice.

Appellants appeal from the trial court’s granting of a summary judgment motion. The Supreme Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 17A A.R.S. Supreme Court Rules, rule 47(e).

Many allegations and claims for relief were presented to the trial court. Rather than attempting to meet the seven issues raised by the appellants in rather broad and ambiguous terms, we have refined those issues into four, as follows:

1. Was appellees’ conduct an intentional infliction of emotional distress?

2. Did appellee, First Service Corporation, breach its fiduciary duties as trustee under the deed of trust?

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Lassen Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Cluff v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  3. Baltimore Life Insurance Company v. HarnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  4. Judkins v. Sadler-MacNeilWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Hall v. Motorists Insurance CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Mintz v. Bell Atlantic Systems Leasing International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  2. Steinberger v. McVeyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. Williams v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of ArlingtonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
  4. Hogan v. Washington Mutual Bank, N.A.Arizona Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Focal Point, Inc. v. U-Haul Co. of Arizona, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API