Legal Opinion

Nordeen v. Bank of America, N.A. (In Re Nordeen)

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 9, 2013No. BAP NV-12-1441-DKiCo; Bankruptcy 09-21273-LED; Adversary 11-01076-LEDPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DUNN, Bankruptcy Judge.

The appellants William F. and Carol A. Nordeen (the “Nordeens”) appeal the dismissal of their Second Amended Complaint against BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, fka Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP (“BAC”), and ReconTrust Company, N.A. (“ReconTrust”), without leave to amend. Hereafter, BAC and ReconTrust are referred to collectively as “appellees.” 2 We AFFIRM.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The following factual narrative is derived from factual statements in the Nor-deens’ Second Amended Complaint and the exhibits thereto, and the bankruptcy court’s Memorandum Decision…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Valerie J. SlotkeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  2. Sandri v. Capital One, N.A. (In re Sandri)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2013
  3. Smith v. CitiMortgage, Inc. (In re Smith)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2014
  4. Arce v. LHM Dodge Ram AvondaleDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
  5. Brick Law PLLC v. Sticky's Holdings LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2025

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API