Legal Opinion
Edward Zadrozny v. Bank of New York Mellon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 28, 2013No. 11-16597PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:
Appellants Edward and Kymberly Za-drozny (the Zadroznys) challenge the dismissal of their first amended complaint against Defendants/Appellees. The Za-droznys contend that the district court erred in dismissing their claims that Ap-pellees improperly initiated non-judicial foreclosure proceedings after the Zadroz-nys failed to comply with the mortgage obligations financing their residence. The Zadroznys also challenge the district court’s denial of leave to further amend their Complaint. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
On August 17, 2005, the Zadroznys borrowed $543,600…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- HENRY A. v. WilldenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Inter-Local Pension Fund Gcc/i v. Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Veal v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. (In Re Veal)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Greg Landers v. Quality Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Chris Taylor v. John ChiangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Sam Francis Foundation v. Christies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Sandri v. Capital One, N.A. (In re Sandri)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2013
- Marshall Block v. Ebay, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.