Legal Opinion

State v. Teixeira

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 30, 2013No. 100276, 100301; A146865, A146866PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

Defendant, who was convicted of one count of burglary in the first degree, ORS 164.225, and multiple counts of first- and second-degree theft, ORS 164.055; ORS 164.045, appeals, assigning error to the imposition of an upward durational departure sentence on the first-degree burglary conviction. He contends that the trial court erred in predicating that departure, in part, on the “multiple victims” enhancement factor, OAR 213-008-0002(l)(b)(G) (3/8/96), which, defendant asserts, is inapposite given the circumstances of the burglary. That rule allows an upward dura-tional departure from a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. GlaspeyOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. LuersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  5. Harris v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. LykinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. WorthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. Brand Energy Services, LLC v. Oregon Occupational Safety & Health DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. State v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. State v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API