State v. Teixeira
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.
Defendant, who was convicted of one count of burglary in the first degree, ORS 164.225, and multiple counts of first- and second-degree theft, ORS 164.055; ORS 164.045, appeals, assigning error to the imposition of an upward durational departure sentence on the first-degree burglary conviction. He contends that the trial court erred in predicating that departure, in part, on the “multiple victims” enhancement factor, OAR 213-008-0002(l)(b)(G) (3/8/96), which, defendant asserts, is inapposite given the circumstances of the burglary. That rule allows an upward dura-tional departure from a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. GlaspeyOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. LuersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Harris v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. LykinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. WorthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Brand Energy Services, LLC v. Oregon Occupational Safety & Health DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.