Goodness v. Beckham

Respondent appeals from a judgment granting petitioner’s requested permanent stalking protective order (SPO). On appeal, respondent challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the order and the award of attorney fees to petitioner. We review the facts de novo, Hanzo v. deParrie, 152 Or App 525, 537, 935 P2d 1130 (1998), and conclude that the record does not contain evidence of two or more contacts that meet the requirements for entry of an SPO. We therefore reverse.

Petitioner has known respondent for 15 years. They were formerly married to each other and have a son, “C.” During…