Legal Opinion
United States v. Hosvaldo Lopez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 12, 2007No. 05-30347PublishedCited by 235 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge POLLAK; Concurrence by Judge NOONAN.
OPINION
POLLAK, District Judge.
In February 2005, the District Court of Oregon denied defendant Hosvaldo Lopez’s pretrial motion to suppress evidence found in his car. Lopez subsequently pled guilty to possessing methamphetamine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a), but reserved the right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress. He was sentenced to a term of incarceration of 135 months. He now timely appeals from the denial of his pretrial motion to suppress evidence and his resulting conviction. Because we…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by235 opinions
- Harper v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Ewing v. City of StocktonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Fayer v. VaughnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Torres v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Edgerly v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
230 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.