Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Aloia
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 14, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 16, 1999, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he had a reasonable assurance of continued employment.
*651Claimant, a substitute teacher, worked on a per diem basis during the 1995-1996 academic year. During the 1996 summer recess, he applied for, and collected, unemployment insurance benefits. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board determined that claimant was ineligible to receive benefits based on, inter alia, its finding that claimant had a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Claim of MakisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of BarrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claim of HammondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Claim of CortorrealAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re KurtzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of PapapietroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claims of GoodmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002